- Private LLM in Europe
- Fixed price in 3 days
- Private endpoint in 2-4 weeks
Your own LLM.
Your own data.
Every prompt sent to a hosted API leaves your control. Run Llama, Mistral or Qwen on your own EU infrastructure, behind an API your app already speaks.
You talk to the engineer who builds it.
12products shipped
7 built solo, 5 embedded in client teams.
When self-hosting wins.And when it does not.
- 01
Data sovereignty
Healthcare, legal, finance and public sector, where data must never leave. Pairs with GDPR and the EU AI Act.
- 02
Cost at volume
Past a steady volume, owned GPUs undercut per-token pricing. Below it, start with an AI cost audit.
- 03
Control
No rate limits, no forced deprecations, no policy change breaking your product overnight.
- 04
Honest fit check
If a hosted API is the better call for you, I will say so.
What I build.A private API that behaves like a commercial one.
- 01
Model serving
vLLM or TGI with batching and an OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so your client code mostly just works.
- 02
RAG over your docs
A private retrieval pipeline with EU-hosted vectors, hybrid search and reranking.
- 03
Model selection
Benchmarked on your data, not a leaderboard, and sized for your latency and GPU budget.
- 04
Evals and monitoring
Quality evals, latency, cost and GPU dashboards.
Call to launch.In weeks, not quarters.
Start with the callErgini · Software & AI developer
I build every project myself,so I only take a few at a time.

3 days
A fixed price, in writing,
three days after the call.
- Scoped from what we discuss on the call.
- Agreed before any work starts.
- Engineering only: GPU and hosting spend is billed by your provider.
Questions.Answered straight.
Why self-host an LLM instead of using OpenAI or Claude?
Three reasons: data sovereignty (the data never leaves your infrastructure), cost at scale (past a certain volume, owned GPUs beat per-token pricing), and control (no rate limits, no model deprecations, no surprise policy changes). For many EU teams in healthcare, legal, finance, and government, the first reason alone makes it non-negotiable. For most others, a hosted API is still the right call - I will tell you honestly which camp you are in.
Which open-source models do you deploy?
Llama, Mistral and Mixtral, Qwen, and DeepSeek depending on the task, plus embedding models like BGE and E5 for retrieval. I benchmark a few candidates on your actual workload rather than picking by leaderboard, because the best model for your data is rarely the biggest one.
Where does it run?
On-premise on your own hardware, in your private cloud, or in an EU region of a provider you already use (Hetzner, OVH, Scaleway, AWS, Azure, GCP). The point is that you choose, and personal data stays where your compliance team needs it. This pairs directly with GDPR and EU AI Act requirements.
What does the deployment include?
Model serving (vLLM or TGI), an OpenAI-compatible API so your app code barely changes, autoscaling and GPU sizing, a RAG pipeline over your documents if needed, evaluation, monitoring, and cost tracking. You get a private endpoint that behaves like a commercial API but runs on your terms.
Is a self-hosted model as good as GPT or Claude?
For general reasoning, the best closed models still lead. But for a focused task - classification, extraction, domain Q&A, summarization over your own data - a well-chosen open model with good retrieval is often indistinguishable in quality and far cheaper at volume. I am candid about where the gap is real and where it is not.
How much does a self-hosted LLM deployment cost?
It depends on your volume and how production-ready it has to be, and you get a fixed price in writing within three days of a free 30-minute call, before any work starts. A proof-of-concept private endpoint with RAG takes 2-4 weeks; a production deployment with autoscaling, evals, and monitoring takes 5-9 weeks. Your GPU and infrastructure spend is separate and billed by your provider.
Pick a time.The call is free.
30 minutes, on Google Meet
Prefer email? ergin@ergini.com. I reply within hours.
Worked examples: a private AI gateway · an internal knowledge assistant · contract review · PDF data extraction · an AI cost audit
Related: GDPR-compliant AI · EU AI Act compliant development · AI integration