Case study · Xandidate

Every applicant read.
Without the stack of CVs.

How Xandidate reads every application against the job post and hands hiring teams a ranked shortlist, with the reasons behind each score.

Visit XandidateBuild something like it
Xandidate's screening board: every applicant for a role shown as a dot, with twelve shortlisted
Xandidate's ranked shortlist: candidates best match first, each with the reasons behind the score

Five hiring problems.
Each one fixed.

  1. 01Hundreds of applications for one role, and nobody reads them all.

    Every application is read in full and scored on the criteria in your job post.

  2. 02A ranking nobody can explain is a ranking nobody trusts.

    Each score points to the lines in the CV it came from, so your team can check it.

    One candidate's score in Xandidate: the criteria from the job post, the lines from her CV behind each score, a gap turned into an interview question, and the team's decision

  3. 03Good people get filtered out, and nobody notices.

    Nothing is filtered out quietly. A doubt becomes an interview question instead.

  4. 04The job post and the interview questions eat the week.

    The job post is drafted from one sentence, and the questions are written for each person.

    Xandidate writes the job post, reads every CV, ranks with reasons, drafts interview questions and keeps your team's feedback in one place

  5. 05An AI that turns people down on its own is a risk.

    Xandidate ranks and explains. Only your team moves people forward or turns them down.

Live at xandidate.com, with 14 days free and no card required.

Xandidate, AI candidate screening and rankingTry it free for 14 days

Related: AI agent development · AI integration · the AURA case study · the Caldra case study